Extra credit points..

Folks
  Some inquisitive souls reminded me that I didn't send the extra credit marks. Here are the cumulative weighted extra-credit points
(here is how weighting is done. If you got 10 extra points on an assignment whose regular maximum was 50, and the whole assignment is worth 7 points of your final grade, then you got (10/50)*7 extra points).

regards
Rao

Grades posted & projects/homeworks available for pickup at the TA's desk

Folks
 
 After much deliberation, including trips down to the advising office to dig out the grades I gave to the students who took this course the last time, extensive discussions with the TA, the oracle of Tempe, and assorted other minor and major Deities, I decided I reached the requisite level of enlightenment (and/or the can't care anymore nirvana) to post the  grades, and promptly hit post-to-sis.

The last homework and the project are available for pickup from the TA's desk.

It was nice teaching you and I hope you enjoyed the class tolerably well. Have a nice summer.

cheers
Rao

Almost final cumulatives...

Here are the almost final cumulatives. (Extrac credit points will be sent separately).

 

You can check to make sure that your marks are recorded correctly (and let me know if there are any problems).

 

Also, the two students who are at the top of CSE494 and CSE598 are welcome to send me suggestions as to what should be the

grade cutoffs and/or highest/lowest grades in the class (of course, there is no guarantee that I will follow their suggestions--but they

have earned the right to make suggestions ;-)

 

 

Here are a couple of notes. Final homework (sans the WWW paper)  was graded for 7 points just like other homeworks.

The WWW paper summary and class presentation was graded for 8 points (under the column FHW)

The participation was graded for 8 points.

For the WWW paper summary and class presentation, I first put letter grades and then converted them into points

(So the letter grades you see interspersed are *NOT* your course grades but are just for participation and presentation).

 

The % columns are essentially relative percentages, assuming that the top student in each group gets 100%

 

regards

Rao

 

 

 

 

Posting ID	hw 1(38)	proj 1(40)	hw 2(74)	proj 2(60)	proj 2 Extra Credit	Midterm(75)	hw 3(50)	hw4(62)	hw 4 extra	Proj 3+demo(50 + 55)	Extra Credit	HW Tot	Proj Tot	Midterm		FHW	Participation	Participation	Total	%	Posting ID
	38	40	74	60		75	50	62		105		28.00	36.00	20.00		8.00		8.00	100.00
1373 106	38	40	70	35		59	48	52	5	103		26.21	31.45	15.73	A+	8.00	a	7.00	88.40	100.00	1373 106
9875 069	37	34	45	55	5	55	47	45	3	94	5	22.73	32.17	14.67	a	7.00	b-	3.00	79.57	90.01	9875 069
0338 166	34	40	36	46		39.5	28	39	3	69	5	17.99	26.81	10.53	b	4.50	b-	3.00	62.83	71.08	0338 166
1768 673	37	39	70	56	5	64	48	56		101		26.48	34.42	17.07	a	7.00	a	7.00	91.97	100.00	1768 673
0763 818	38	39	69	57		59.5	47	54		99	10	26.20	34.21	15.87	a	7.00	a	7.00	90.28	98.16	0763 818
1214 609	38	37	72	58	5	65	50	54	11	95	10	26.91	33.31	17.33	b+	5.00	b+	5.00	87.55	95.20	1214 609
7642 942	37	38	70	59	5	46.5	49	54	13	102	17	26.39	34.96	12.40	A	7.00	b+	5.00	85.76	93.24	7642 942
1721 620	38	36	68	54	5	54	47	52		102	5	25.88	33.83	14.40	b+	5.00	a-	6.00	85.11	92.54	1721 620
6584 192	38	40	67	57	5	46	46	56	13	97	10	26.10	33.98	12.27	b+	5.00	a	7.00	84.34	91.71	6584 192
8863 274	36	31	69	52		59	43	52		94	10	25.05	31.22	15.73	b+	5.00	a	7.00	84.00	91.34	8863 274
2135 404	34	36	69	45	10	55.5	48	57	8	101	5	25.95	32.14	14.80	b+	5.00	a-	6.00	83.88	91.21	2135 404
0762 816	35	40	67	56	10	57	21	58	3	100	20	22.27	34.38	15.20	a-	6.00	a-	6.00	83.85	91.18	0762 816
8070 620	35	36	71	54		33	47	56	13	105	20	26.07	34.40	8.80	a-	6.00	a	6.00	81.27	88.36	8070 620
6552 160	36	40	70	54		43	47	51		99	15	25.59	33.86	11.47	b+	5.00	b	4.00	79.92	86.89	6552 160
2563 498	37	30	70	54		54	46	45	2	94		24.96	31.40	14.40	b+	5.00	b-	3.00	78.76	85.64	2563 498
0623 909	36	38	67	55		36	47	51	10	99	5	25.31	33.72	9.60	b+	5.00	b	4.00	77.63	84.41	0623 909
3155 776	36	35	69	56	5	26	47	50	5	99	12	25.38	33.44	6.93	b+	5.00	b	4.00	74.76	81.28	3155 776
2909 949	33	33		35		36.5	46	53	13	82	5	18.50	26.40	9.73	a	7.00	a+	8.00	69.64	75.72	2909 949
1189 582	33	28	61	33		31	48	54	13	93	5	24.67	27.41	8.27	b+	5.00	b	4.00	69.35	75.40	1189 582

The presentation slides and audio from today are on the web..

Thanks for all your work.. I think I have a reasonable idea on what are the fads this year at WWW 2007.

rao

Important: Getting your presentations to the class tomorrow

You have two options for bringing your presentations to the class tomorrow:

 

1. Send the presentation as an attachment to subbarao2z3@gmail.com (Notice it is 2z3  --you can also do it by just replying to this mail)

   *do not send it to my asu address*

  

2. Bring it on a USB stick

 

 

*IN BOTH CASES, NAME THE FILE WITH YOUR LAST NAME*

 

 

Rao

 

Re: Homework 4: new problems added and socket closed. It will be due at the beginning of 5/8 meeting..

The question as stated is correct. It is not necessary that every paper I wrote is covered by at least one source..

rao

On 5/3/07, Bhushan Pendharkar <bpendhar@asu.edu> wrote:

Sir,

 

For Q5 , the question states about a record of 10 papers. However  , 9 papers have been given in the sources.

For performing calculations, which value do we need to consider as  the result of Q ??..  9 or 10

 

Bhushan

 

On 5/2/07, Subbarao Kambhampati <rao@asu.edu> wrote:

demo schedule

Hi,

 

The demo schedule is attached.

 

Bhaumik

Homework 4: new problems added and socket closed. It will be due at the beginning of 5/8 meeting..

two slides added to the lecture notes today...

1. Added a slide at the beginning of the query processing part of today's lecture to explain the "Surfacing the deep web" idea I explained

2. Added a 4th big idea--to talk about adversarial nature of the web. Here is what it says:

Fwd: teaching evaluations

Folks
 
 As per the mail below, I encourage you all to do the online course evaluation--apparently you have a little more than 24 hours left to complete them.

I would particularly encourage written comments as they help me figure out what worked
and what didn't.

As you probably already know, I won't see the comments until much after your grades have been submitted, so you can be (and are encouraged to be) candid.

As and when I do get the comments, I normally share them with the students who took the course (so there will be enough delayed reward in terms of satisfaction of prurient interests ;-)

cheers
rao



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: James Collofello <JAMES.COLLOFELLO@asu.edu >
Date: Apr 24, 2007 12:49 PM
Subject: teaching evaluations
To: "DL.WG.CEAS.Faculty" <DL.WG.CEAS.Faculty@mainex1.asu.edu>

Colleagues,

 

The Spring 2007 teaching evaluations are scheduled to be available to students starting Wed 4/25 around 9:00 am and will close at Wed 5/2 (reading day) at 12:00 midnight.  Students will be able to access the evaluation tool at:  https://intraweb.eas.asu.edu/eval

Please encourage your students to complete the evaluations or face several nagging email requests. 

 

 

James S. Collofello

Associate Dean for Academic and Student Affairs

Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering